Tuesday 15 October 2024

Documents of Our Times-I


 

Canada has been publicly alleging, since September 2023, that the GOI is running a campaign of targeted killings of Canadian citizens of Indian origin. India has repeatedly held these allegations to be completely unfounded. It has also been castigating the Government of Canada, and Prime Minister Trudeau personally, for indulging in these “laughable” aspersions merely to gain domestic political advantage. In this context, The Washington Post has published a report directly naming the Home Minister of India for having authorised the operations. This report is, in all likelihood, vicious anti-India disinformation spread at the behest of Canada. But, the mere fact of such an allegation having been made in a reputed international newspaper makes this report a significant historical document of our times. Below, we reproduce the complete text of the report from:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/10/14/canada-modi-sikhs-violence-india/




Canada alleges much wider campaign 

by Modi government against Sikhs


By Greg Miller, Gerry Shih

 

 

The killing of a Sikh separatist in Canada last year was part of a broader campaign of violence against Indian dissidents directed by a senior official in the Indian government and an operative in the country’s spy agency, according to Canadian officials who cited intercepted Indian communications and other newly acquired information.

 

Canadian authorities have also identified at least six Indian diplomats serving in Canada who were directly involved in gathering detailed intelligence on Sikh separatists who were then killed, attacked or threatened by India’s criminal proxies, Canadian officials said.

 

Canada ordered all six of those diplomats to leave the country in notices that were sent early Monday, the officials said. Among them were India’s top diplomat in the Sanjay Kumar Verma, and its top consular official in Toronto, the officials said. 

 

India issued a conflicting statement saying it had withdrawn the diplomats over concerns for their safety. India later announced that it had expelled six Canadian diplomats, including Canada’s top diplomat in New Delhi.

 

The previously undisclosed details about India’s alleged involvement in the 2023 death of Hardeep Singh Nijjar and other attacks stem from an ongoing investigation that Canadian authorities said has uncovered extensive evidence linking a larger outbreak of violence in Canada to the administration of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 

 

“We know they are involved in the Nijjar killing, in other murders and in ongoing violence — actual violence — in Canada,” said a senior Canadian official. The official said that since Nijjar’s death, the pace of threats has escalated to such an extent that authorities have warned a dozen individuals of Indian descent that there was credible information they could be targeted. The official and others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the investigation, citing the sensitivity of allegations that have caused a rupture in relations between Delhi and Ottawa. 

 

India has vehemently denied the accusations. A statement issued by the country’s Ministry of External Affairs on Monday said that Modi’s government “strongly rejects these preposterous imputations and ascribes them to the political agenda” of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. 

 

Trudeau said Monday that “the response of the Indian government has been to deny, to obfuscate, to attack me personally and the integrity of the government of Canada and its officials and its police agencies.” 

 

Even so, the new allegations add to mounting concerns among Western security officials and human rights organizations that Modi’s government has become one of the world’s most aggressive practitioners of “transnational repression,” or the use of violence and other means to neutralize perceived homegrown adversaries who have sought refuge in other countries. 

 

The Biden administration, which has cultivated closer ties with India, last year confronted Modi administration officials with intelligence that an officer in India’s Research and Analysis Wing, a spy service known as RAW, was behind an attempt to assassinate a Sikh separatist in New York — a failed plot with parallels to the Nijjar case in Canada. The Post identified the RAW officer as Vikram Yadav, though he was not named in a U.S. indictment accusing an alleged Indian drug trafficker of seeking to hire a hit man to carry out the killing. 

 

Nijjar and Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, the target of the New York plot, were leaders of a movement that for decades has campaigned to carve out an independent Sikh state in northern India. The movement was marked by violent clashes in the 1980s, but has been relatively dormant since a crackdown led to a mass exodus of Sikhs to other countries. 

 

Modi, who came to power as a champion of Hindu nationalism, has revived concerns about the supposed threat posed by Sikhs living abroad. Modi and other officials have frequently accused Canada, which has the world’s largest population of Sikhs outside India, of harboring terrorists. 

 

Canadian officials said they only recently began to grasp the magnitude of the covert campaign of violence India has waged against Sikhs as new evidence emerged from an ongoing investigation of Nijjar’s killing that is led by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police but has involved other agencies, as well as intelligence provided by the United States and other allies. 

 

Officials said the investigation has uncovered evidence of Indian government involvement in home invasions, drive-by shootings, arson and at least one additional killing. 

 

Officials cited the death of Sukhdool Singh, who was shot in Winnipeg on Sept. 20, 2023, less than a day after he was featured in a wanted list of gangsters posted on X by India’s National Investigation Agency. The killing came two days after Trudeau publicly accused India of killing Nijjar. 

 

Officials described an operational “chain” in which Indian diplomats in Canada collect intelligence on alleged Sikh separatists that is then used by RAW to identify targets for attacks carried out by a criminal syndicate led by Lawrence Bishnoi, whose organization, the officials said, has an extensive presence in Canada. Bishnoi is imprisoned in India and could not be reached for comment. His organization has previously asserted responsibility for violent attacks in Canada, officials said. 

 

Officials said Indian diplomats have used violence as well as threatened to deny needed immigration documents to coerce Indians living in Canada to serve as informants against Sikh activists. Canadian officials said this scheme involves Indian officials at the country’s consulates in Vancouver and Toronto as well as its High Commission — the embassy equivalent — in Ottawa. Canadian officials said the collection operation was overseen by Verma, India’s high commissioner in Ottawa. 

 

“The coercion goes far beyond threatening to deny visas, to include physical threats to them and their families in India,” said a senior Canadian official, who added that “the information is being sent to India at almost the highest level.”

 

Conversations and texts among Indian diplomats include references to “a senior official in India and a senior official in RAW” who have authorized the intelligence-gathering missions and attacks on Sikh separatists, the Canadian official said. 

 

Canadian officials identified the senior official in India as Amit Shah, a member of Modi’s inner circle who serves as home affairs minister. Spokespeople in India’s Ministry for External Affairs and its Home Ministry, which oversees national security matters, did not respond to requests for comment about Shah’s alleged role. 

 

Canadian officials shared details about the references to Shah and other evidence with India’s national security adviser, Ajit Doval, at a secret meeting in Singapore on Saturday. Canadians who took part in the meeting included Trudeau’s national security adviser, Nathalie Drouin, and Deputy Foreign Minister David Morrison, as well as a top RCMP official. 

 

Canada had sought the meeting in an attempt to persuade Modi’s government to end an escalating campaign of violence in Canada, but also to warn that details exposing Indian involvement in attacks were likely to become public as prosecutors move forward next month with a planned trial of four suspects in Nijjar’s killing. 

 

Instead, officials said Doval made clear that India “would deny any link to the Nijjar murder and any link to any other violence in Canada no matter what the evidence was,” a senior Canadian official said.

 

Officials provided other details about the five-hour encounter with Doval, 79, a former spymaster who is seen as one of Modi’s closest confidants and has served as national security adviser for a decade. 

 

Doval “did admit that India did use its diplomats to follow people, take pictures, et cetera, but denied any links to threats or violence,” an official said. 

 

When Canadian officials outlined evidence that India had enlisted Bishnoi’s gang networks in Canada to carry out the Nijjar killing and other attacks, Doval initially “pretended not to have any idea who the guy was,” a Canadian official said. Later, however, Doval began rattling off “facts, figures and anecdotes” about Bishnoi, acknowledging that he “was capable of orchestrating violence from wherever he is incarcerated” and “was known to be up to no good from his jail cell.” 

 

Bishnoi, 31, is one of India’s most notorious mob bosses, officials said, but has also been accused on social media of collaborating with the government while in prison. Bishnoi’s gang asserted responsibility for Singh’s killing in September last year after Trudeau’s public statement linking India to Nijjar’s death. 

 

In a news conference Monday — Canada’s Thanksgiving holiday — RCMP officials said that violence orchestrated by India had become a “significant threat to public safety,” and that at least eight people have been arrested and charged in connection with homicide cases and nearly two dozen in connection with extortion investigations. 

 

Canadian requests to interview Indian diplomats implicated in attacks were rebuffed by Modi’s government, officials said. 

 

Doval ended the Saturday meeting by asking his counterparts to treat the discussion as if it “never took place” — meaning they should refrain from issuing any public statement or acknowledgment of the gathering. 

 

By the time Drouin and Morrison had made it back to Ottawa, however, pro-Modi media reports had surfaced in India describing how Indian officials had taken a “strong stance” and lectured Canada that “it cannot make unsubstantiated charges.” 

 

Amanda Coletta in Toronto contributed to this report.

 


The Washington Post

Updated October 14, 2024 at 2:16 p.m. EDT|Published October 14, 2024 at 11:01 a.m. EDT

Sunday 25 August 2024

Ullavur and Kundratthur I (English)

 

Two Beautiful, Affluent and Self-Governing Localities of India

Ullavur and Kundratthur



We in the Centre for Policy Studies, in collaboration with the IGNCA, have recently published a couple of monographs on the geography, history, economy and polity of two localities of Tamil Nadu: Ullavur and Kundratthur. The books are compiled and edited by J. K. Bajaj and M. D. Srinivas. We have earlier posted the notice of the release function. In the note below, we describe in brief these books and what they teach us about the pre-British Indian polity of India.




More than three decades ago, when we founded the Centre for Policy Studies at Chennai, one of the main objectives before us was to learn how the polity of India functioned and what was the relationship between the State and the Society before the arrival of the British.

 

The classical civilizational literature of India is one of the sources where we may find answers to these questions. We did carry out some studies along that direction. The first few books of the Centre, especially Annam Bahu Kurvita: Recollecting the Indian Discipline of Growing and Sharing Food in Plenty, were based on our study of our civilizational literature including the Vedas, Upanishads, Itihasas, Puranas and Kavyas.

 

It was our good fortune that we had access to another source of information on the pre-British Indian polity. Sri Dharampal, the pioneering historian of eighteenth century India, had, during his extensive archival explorations, come across the records of a survey that the British carried out in about 2,000 Tamil localities from 1767 to 1774. These localities constituted the so-called Chengalpattu Jaghire which the British had obtained from the then Nawab of Arcot. The Jaghire is located around the city of Chennai. In this survey, the British, it seems, were looking for an answer to the same questions that we were interested in: How were these localities being governed till then and also what could be the value of these? They needed answers to these questions before setting up their own administration in the Jaghire.

 

This survey was carried out by Engineer Thomas Barnard. The summary records of the survey in English are available in the Tamil Nadu State Archives. These were copied from more detailed accounts inscribed in older Tamil on palm-leaves by the traditional account-keepers of these localities, the Kanakkappillais. Such accounts had been traditionally maintained and Mr. Barnard got the Kankkappillais to draw up the details he needed in a similar fashion.

 

The accounts collected in these palm-leaves are very detailed. These give the name of the head of every household, his jati and occupation and the extent of his house and the backyard. These also record the details of every temple and every lake, pond, pool and well. The accounts also record the location and extent of every piece of cultivated and barren land. And, for the years 1762 to 1767, the accounts give the extent of crops that were grown in the fields during different seasons and their produce. Further, these accounts give us the process of deduction and allocation of nearly a third of the produce for varied institutions, functions and functionaries of the locality.

 

We have copied, compiled and analysed the entire archival records of the Barnard Survey. We have deciphered, copied and translated into modern Tamil the palm-leaf manuscript accounts for about 600 localities. We have also translated the accounts of a few localities into English.

 

The two books that we have published recently give the story of the land and people of Kundratthur and Ullavur based on the information we have gathered from the archival and palm-leaf manuscript materials of the Barnard Survey. In addition, we have used the large number of inscriptions that have been recorded from Kundratthur and from the near vicinity of Ullavur. We have also used the details given in the famed Kasakkudi copperplate of the Pallava period, which pertains to a village whose coordinates, as described in the epigraph, coincide with that of Ullavur.

 

While collecting, studying and analysing all this data and compiling the two monographs, we have identified some major aspects of a locality or grama of the pre-British Indian polity. Below we share the salient aspects of an Indian locality:

 

 

1. An Indian Grama has an Identity of its own. It is not a mere collection of Houses.

 

Everything that we have learnt about the Chengalpattu localities and especially the two that we describe in these books tells us that the locality or the grama is a well-defined, long-established, self-governing unit of the polity. Every locality has a long history of its own. It has its own demarcated boundaries and a system for keeping those boundaries inviolate. 

 

The boundaries of an Indian locality were considered so sacrosanct and inviolate that Thomas Munro in his testimony to the House of Commons in the course of discussion on the East India Company Charter of 1813, said:

 

A village in India does not apply to what is commonly called a village in this country [United Kingdom], a collection of houses; a village is certainly a portion of country, generally from two to four square miles, the boundaries of which are unalterable; whatever cessions or transfers of country are made in the course of war from one power to another, the boundaries of the village remain permanent; …”

 

In the two monographs on Ullavur and Kundratthur, we have given several maps depicting different aspects of the localities within their sacrosanct boundaries.

 

 

2. Every Indian Grama has a long history of its own.

 

The localities of India are mentioned in epigraphs inscribed on stone and copper. The localities have been talked about in epics, stories and legends. Many of the localities have their own sthala-puranas, the founding-legends. The two localities described in these monographs seem to have an especially long and well-described history.

 

As many as 55 inscriptions have been recorded from the locality of Kundratthur. These run from 1153 to 1726, from the peak of Chola period to nearly the end of the Mughals. The transactions and events recorded in these relate mainly to the locality itself, the king is mentioned in the inscriptions often only as a marker of date and time.

 

The history of Kundratthur is witnessed also by the great Sekkizhar. He was born here, compiled the life-histories and work of the 63 Naynmars, saint-poets, of the Tamil Saiva tradition, in his Periya Puranam and was raised to the semi-divine status of the 64th Nayanmar. Several places in Kundratthur remind you of Sekkizhar. There is a temple at the place of his birth. The imposing Nageshvarar temple is known to have been built by him and there is a separate shrine dedicated to him in that temple. The vast Balaravayar Tank in the centre of the town is named after his brother. There is also an impressive new memorial built for him.

 

The name of the locality comes from the Subrahmanyar Temple on top of the hill that overlooks the town from its southern end. The history of this temple is timeless, though the earliest inscriptions on its walls are from only the Chola times.

 

The temple on the hill (kundram in Tamil), commonly known as the Kundratthur Murugan, has a special place in the life of Kundratthur even today. The stream of pilgrims that visit the temple and many who hold their birth and marriage ceremonies in the presence of the Murugan make a considerable contribution to the economy and transport system of the locality.

 

The region around Ullavur has been mentioned in the Kasakkudi copperplate of the times of Nandivarman Pallavamalla. In fact, the coordinates of the village, the grant of which the copperplate records, correspond to the immediate vicinity of Ullavur, if not Ullavur itself. There are a number of inscriptions from the early Chola period in the temples of Thenneri, the vast lake in the north of Ullavur that also irrigates its fields. The channels bringing water from that lake are specifically mentioned in the Kasakkudi copperplate. In the south of Ullavur, there is the Appan Venkatesa Perumal Temple lying on the heartachingly beautiful and sacred confluence of Palar, Cheyyar and Vegavathi. Inscriptions in this temple run all across almost every wall. All these are witness to the ancientness of Ullavur. 

 

 


3. Indian Locality was Affluent and Prosperous

 

According to our estimates, on the basis of the data recorded in the Barnard Survey, average annual production of foodgrains in the whole of the Jaghire amounted to as much as 1 ton per capita. This is comparable to the most advanced nations of today. The Indian average today is only about one-fifth of that.

 

Ullavur is situated in a particularly fertile part of the land and is an intensely agricultural locality. Production of Ullavur in the eighteenth century amounts to 2.5 ton per capita. This is two and half times the average of the Jaghire.


The affluence of the localities is also seen in the extremely beautiful and rich landscape of their habitations, which we discuss below.

 

 

 

4. Indian Grama was not exclusively agricultural

 

Notwithstanding the abundant production of foodgrains in the Jaghire as a whole and in particular localities, these localities were not exclusively agricultural. According to the data of the Survey only about half of the households in an average locality could be said to be predominantly agricultural. Besides them, there were the households of the weavers, carpenters, iron smiths, gold smiths, traders, teachers, scholars, medicine-men, temple priests, dancers, etc., as also the militia, the accounts-keepers, the corn-measurers and the caretakers of irrigation and keepers of the village boundaries, etc.

 

In Kundratthur, agriculture seems to have been secondary. This was mainly a center of religion, culture and scholarship. Among the total of 471 households counted here in the eighteenth century, 116 belonged to the weavers and their associated specialists.


Ullavur was indeed an intensely agricultural locality. It produced six different paddy crops in the three seasons. Among the six crops, some were of highly specialized fragrant paddies. Even so, the locality had a complement of 30 households of cultural, administrative, artisanal economic and other service providers.

 

 

5. Indian Locality was Beautiful

 

From the older accounts and descriptions and from even the current state of some of the localities, it can be confidently said that the localities of India and the houses within them were laid on a well-ordered plan. There were a large number of temples, ponds, pools and tanks, groves and gardens in and around every locality. 


All of this created a beautiful and comforting ambience. Ullavur, a locality of just 83 households, had 14 temples, 22 ponds and pools, 4 large water-bodies for irrigation, 6 groves and 2 flower-gardens. Many of these temples and ponds, pools and other waterbodies survive to this day. Many of the temples and the water-bodies are large, beautiful and very impressive.

 

Kundratthur is of course a town of temples. There is the Kundratthur Murugan on the hill and below it you see the Kandaleesvarar, Thiruvaleesvarar and Thiruoorgaperumal standing almost in a row leading up to the hill. Then there is the Thirunagesvarar at the entrance of the town in the north. Besides these great and ancient temples, there are many smaller temples. The town also has several large waterbodies. The largest and most impressive of these is the Balaravayar Kulam, named after the brother of the venerable Sekkizhar. There are several memorials to Sekkizhar himself in the town.

 

In our monographs on the two localities of this region, we have tried to convey some of this grandeur and beauty of the landscape in the large number of pictures that we have presented there. We have posted some of the more striking pictures along with this article.

 

 

6. Indian Locality was Self-Governing

 

According to the data of the eighteenth century that we have compiled, around one-third of the produce of the locality was allocated for different public functions, functionaries and institutions.

 

There was an elaborate arrangement, sanctified in tradition, for making deductions from the produce. There were two distinct kinds of deductions. The first was called Suthanthiram, Swatantram in Sanskrit, and the second was called Merai. Suthanthiram deductions were made in two steps. First, a defined deduction for a long list of beneficiaries was made before the crop was threshed or measured. The second Suthanthiram deduction was made after threshing but before measuring. From the measured produce two kinds of Merai deductions were made. One of these Merais was taken out half from the Cultivators’ share and half from the Revenue share of the produce. The other Merai was taken out entirely from the Revenue share. These four deductions together constituted around one-third of the produce.

 

The list of functions, functionaries and institutions for whom these deductions were made was indeed long. It included the Palaiyakkarar and Tukkirikkarar who looked after the security of the locality, the Kanakkappillais who kept the accounts, Vettis who looked after the irrigation, Alavukkarans who measured the produce. It also included the temples and the associated priests, scholars, dancers and musicians. It included the teachers of the locality schools and the higher scholars. It included the carpenters, iron smiths, gold smiths, barbers, washermen and medicine men associated with the locality. There were also deductions for the founding inhabitants, the Mirasudarars and the so-called Cultivators’ Servants, the Paraiyar. The locality thus budgeted and provided for all of the essential public functions of the locality that have been taken over by the State today.

 

Besides these specified deductions from the produce, most of the beneficiaries mentioned above also held certain parts of the cultivated land as Maniyam, whose revenue accrued to the Maniyam-holder. According to our calculations, around one-fourth of the cultivated land of the entire Jaghire was assigned as Maniyam. In Kundratthur, Maniyams formed around 20 percent of the cultivation. In Ullavur, where the land was highly fertile, the Maniyams formed a relatively smaller part at around one-eighth of the cultivation.

 

The long list of beneficiaries who held the right to the revenue of a part of the land essentially became formal sharers in sovereignty. The locality ran all its public affairs through these beneficiaries who were maintained by allocations made to them in the form of Suthintaram and Merai and the revenue from their Maniyams. This made the locality sovereign in its own affairs. This made the locality sovereign in its own affairs. 

 

The self-governing locality formed the primary unit of the Indian polity. Among the beneficiaries of the deductions and Maniyams, the locality also included institutions and functionaries at the regional level and thus created the larger circle of polity beyond itself. 

 

A few months before Independence, Mahatma Gandhi presented a conception of the polity of oceanic circles and commended it for the future Independent India. In that conception the locality formed the centre of the polity and it constituted larger and larger polity in the form of expanding oceanic circles, all of which were at the same level, none above or below the other. Together they constituted the nation. The localities of Chengalpattu and especially the localities of Ullavur and Kundratthur that we have described in detail in these two monographs offer functioning examples of the oceanic polity of Gandhiji’s conception.

 

 


The task before us

 

Nowadays, there is much talk about decolonising our polity, out institutions and our discourse. We shall be able to transcend the colonial system that the British have left behind when we restore the sovereignty of the localities and return to them their traditional function of governing themselves through their own resources and people. That would probably take some more time. But for us to keep moving in that direction, it is important to retain the memory of the sovereign self-governing localities of not-too-distant a past. To keep the memory alive, we have to keep doing at least the following—

 

Intensively study the beautiful, affluent, prosperous and self-governing localities of the pre-British India from every part of the country;

 

Preserve, compile and study the inscriptions, copperplates, palm-leaf accounts and archival documents of different periods and from different parts of India;

 

Revive and restore to their pristine grandeur, some of the localities like Ullavur and Kundratthur, to serve as exemplars of what a decolonized India shall look like.

 

This is the process that shall lead to an authentic history of timeless India. This is also the process through which India shall rise again from the deep slumber into which she lapsed during the colonial rule. 




Pictures of the two localities of Ullavur and Kundratthur.


Hindi version of this article.





Bibliographic and other information about the two monographs:




The Land, People and History of Ullavur, 
A locality that reaps the bounty of Palar 
by Jatinder K Bajaj and M. D, Srinivas 

 

Centre for Policy Studies, Chennai and 
Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, Delhi, 2024 
ISBN 978-81-19380-57-2  Price: 1566/-

 


The Land, People and History of Kundratthur 
The Abode of Murugan and the Birthplace of Sekkizhar 
by Jatinder K Bajaj and M. D, Srinivas 

 

Centre for Policy Studies, Chennai and 
Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, Delhi, 2024 
ISBN 978-81-19380-78-7  Price: 1652/-


The books are available at:

Ullavur: https://amzn.in/d/dY5Nta0 
Kundratthur: https://amzn.in/d/hy6ROqw

You may also please send your orders to [email protected] and copy it to [email protected]

Ullavur and Kundratthur I (Hindi)



भारत के दो समृद्ध, सुन्दर, स्वशासी गाँव—

उल्लावूर एवं कुण्ड्रत्तूर



समाजनीति समीक्षण केन्द्र के हम लोगों ने इंदिरा गांधी राष्ट्रीय कलाकेन्द्र के सहयोग से सम्प्रति तमिलनाडु के दो ग्रामों उल्लावूर एवं कुण्ड्रत्तूर के भूगोल, इतिहास, अर्थ-व्यवस्था और समाज एवं राज्यव्यवस्था का विस्तृत वर्णन करते हुए दो पुस्तकों का प्रकाशन किया है। पुस्तकों के लेखक-संपादक जतिन्दर कुमार बजाज एवं एम. डी. श्रीनिवास हैं। लोकार्पण का सूचना पत्र यहाँ उपलब्ध है। इस आलेख में हम इन पुस्तकों की विषय-वस्तु एवं इन से अंग्रेजों से पहले के भारत की समाज एवं राज्यनीति संबंधी जो समझ बनती है वह संक्षेप में रखने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं।




चौंतीस वर्ष पूर्व हमने जब समाजनीति समीक्षण केन्द्र की स्थापना की थी तो हमारे समक्ष एक प्रमुख उद्देश्य यह जानना था कि अंग्रेजों के पूर्व के भारत की प्रशासनिक व्यवस्थाएँ कैसे चलती थीं और भारत में समाज एवं राज्य के मध्य क्या संबंध हुआ करता था।

 

इन प्रश्नों के उत्तर का एक स्रोत तो हमारा सभ्यतागत साहित्य है। हमने उस दिशा में कुछ अध्ययन किया है। केन्द्र की पहली कुछ पुस्तकें और विशेषतः अन्नं बहु कुर्वीत इसी आधार पर लिखी गयीं थी। उस साहित्य से संकल्पना के स्तर पर इन प्रश्नों के उत्तर मिलते हैं।

 

सौभाग्य से हमारे पास इन प्रश्नों के उत्तर ढूंढने का एक और स्रोत भी था। आदरणीय धर्मपालजी ने १७६७-१७७४ के मध्य अंग्रजों द्वारा किये गये चेन्नै के आसपास स्थित चेङ्गलपेट्टु जागीर क्षेत्र के प्रायः २,००० ग्रामों के एक बहुत विस्तृत सर्वेक्षण के अभिलेख देखे थे। इस सर्वेक्षण के माध्यम से लगता है अंग्रेज भी कदाचित् इसी प्रश्न का उत्तर ढूंढ रहे थे कि तब तक भारतीय लोगों की प्रशासनिक एवं अन्य सार्वजनिक व्यवस्थाएँ क्या थीं। इसके अतिरिक्त वे यह भी जानना चाहते थे कि इन गाँवों का कुल उत्पादन क्या था और वे उससे कितना लगान निकाल सकते थे। 

 

यह सर्वेक्षण बारनार्ड सर्वेक्षण के नाम से जाना जाता है। तमिलनाडु राज्य अभिलेखागार में इस सर्वेक्षण के अंग्रेजी सारांश के अभिलेख उपलब्ध हैं। यह सारांश ताड़पत्रों पर अंकित अधिक विस्तृत आंकड़ों के आधार पर बनाया गया था। गाँव से सम्बन्धित समस्त आंकड़ों को गाँव के कनक्कपिल्लै (लेखपाल) द्वारा नियमित अंकित करते रहने की प्रथा कदाचित् दीर्घ काल से इस क्षेत्र में चलती आ रही थी। बारनार्ड ने अपना सर्वेक्षण इन्हीं ग्राम-कनक्कपिल्लैओं के द्वारा उनकी पारंपरिक रीति के अनुरूप ही करवाया था।  सौभाग्य से हम छह-सात सौ गाँवों के इन ताड़पत्रों को भी देख पाये हैं।  ताड़पत्रों में दिये गये आंकड़े बहुत विस्तृत हैं। इनमें गाँव के प्रत्येक परिवार के मुखिया का नाम, जाति, कार्य एवं उसके घर के विस्तार का उल्लेख है, प्रत्येक मंदिर, प्रत्येक तालाब अथवा अन्य जल-स्रोत का, प्रत्येक खेत के विस्तार और उसमें १७६२ से १७६७ के पांच वर्षों में हुए उत्पादन का, और फिर उस उत्पादन के प्रायः एक-तिहाई अंश के विभिन्न सार्वजनिक कार्यों के लिये नियोजन के विस्तृत आंकड़े हैं।

 

हमने बारनार्ड सर्वेक्षण के समस्त उपलब्ध आंकड़ों का संकलन एवं विश्लेषण किया है। अनेक गाँवों से संबंधित ताड़पत्रों के आंकड़ों को पढ़ कर उनका आधुनिक तमिल और अंग्रेजी में अनुवाद करने का कार्य भी हमने किया है। सद्यप्रकाशित जिन दो पुस्तकों की चर्चा हम इस आलेख में कर रहे हैं, उनमें बारनार्ड सर्वेक्षण के अंग्रेजी अभिलेखों एवं उनसे जुड़े तमिल ताड़पत्रों के विस्तृत आंकड़ों और इन गाँवों में अथवा उनके आसपास पाये जाने वाले प्रचुर शिलालेखों एवं ताम्रपत्रों आदि के आधार पर इस क्षेत्र के दो गाँवों, उल्लावूर और कुण्ड्रात्तूर का वर्णन किया गया है।

 

इस अध्ययन से भारत के ग्रामों के जो मुख्य आयाम हमें समझ आये हैं वे संक्षेप में इस प्रकार है—


 

१.    भारत के प्रत्येक गाँव का अपना व्यक्तित्व है। गाँव कुछ घरों का जमघट मात्र नहीं है। 

 

गाँव एक सुस्पष्ट एवं सुस्थिर स्वशासित इकाई है। प्रत्येक गाँव का अपना सुदीर्घ इतिहास है। अपनी चिन्हित सीमाएँ हैं और इन सीमाओं की सुरक्षा करने की व्यवस्थाएँ हैं। गाँव की सीमाएँ इतनी स्थिर मानी जाती थीं कि थॉमस मुनरो १८१३ में हाउस ऑफ कॉमन्स में भारतीय व्यवस्थाओं के विषय में साक्ष्य प्रस्तुत करते हुए कहते हैं कि—

 

A village in India does not apply to what is commonly called a village in this country [United Kingdom], a collection of houses; a village is certainly a portion of country, generally from two to four square miles, the boundaries of which are unalterable; whatever cessions or transfers of country are made in the course of war from one power to another, the boundaries of the village remain permanent; …”

 

इसलिये इन दो पुस्तकों में हमने दोनों गाँवों के बहुत विस्तृत और बहुआयामी मानचित्र प्रस्तुत किये हैं।

 


 

२.    भारत के प्रत्येक गाँव का सुदीर्घ इतिहास है। 

 

शिलालेखों, ताम्रपत्रों, कथा-वार्ताओं, काव्यों-महाकाव्यों आदि में दीर्घ काल से अपने गाँवों का उल्लेख आता रहा है। जिन दो गाँवों के विषय में ये पुस्तकें हैं, उनकी ऐतिहासिकता तो अनेक प्रकार से अंकित है।

 

कुण्ड्रत्तूर से ५५ शिलालेख संकलित किये जा चुके हैं । ये ११५३ से १७२६, अथवा चोळवंश के उत्कर्ष से मुगलकाल के अंत तक का इतिहास बताते हैं। कुण्ड्रत्तूर के इतिहास के साक्षी सेक्किऴार भी हैं। वे कुण्ड्रत्तूर में उत्पन्न हुए और तमिळ् शैव परम्परा के ६३ सन्तकवि नायन्मारों की गाथाओं का संकलन करके स्वयं ६४वें नायन्मार् के रूप में प्रतिष्ठित हुए।  कुण्ड्रत्तूर के अनेक स्थल उनकी स्मृति सहेजे हुए हैं। उनके जन्मस्थान पर एक मन्दिर स्थापित है। यहाँ का प्रमुख नागेश्वरर् मन्दिर उन द्वारा स्थापित माना जाता है और मन्दिर के भीतर उनकी पृथक् सन्निद्धि है। भव्य बालवारायार् ताल उनके भाई के नाम से है। आधुनिक काल में एक नया भव्य स्मारक उनके नाम से बनाया गया है।   

 

कुण्ड्रत्तूर का नाम हाँ पहाड़ी (तमिळ् में कुण्ड्र) पर स्थित सुब्रह्मण्यर् के मन्दिर से आता है और उनका इतिहास तो पौराणिक काल का है। सामान्यतः इस मन्दिर को कुण्ड्रत्तूर मुरुगन कहा जाता है। यहाँ के जनजीवन में आज भी इन मुरुगन का प्रमुख स्थान है। मन्दिर में आने वाले अनेक श्रद्धालुओं का यहाँ की अर्थ एवं यातायात व्यवस्था में बड़ा योगदान है।

 

उल्लावूर के आसपास के क्षेत्र का उल्लेख पल्लव काल के विख्यात कासाक्कुड़ी ताम्रपत्र में आता है। उल्लावूर के उत्तर में तेन्नेरि के मन्दिरों और दक्षिण में पालार्, चेय्यार् और वेगवती के पवित्र त्रिवेणी संगम पर स्थित अप्पन् वेंकटेश पेरुमाल् के मन्दिर की भीतियों पर सघनता से अंकित चोळ् काल के शिलालेख इस क्षेत्र के दीर्घ इतिहास के साक्षी हैं।

 

 

३.    भारत का गाँव धन-धान्य से समृद्ध था।  

 

हमारे आकलन के अनुसार इस पूरे क्षेत्र का उत्पादन १ टन प्रति व्यक्ति प्रति वर्ष था। आज अति-विकसित देशों में ऐसा उत्पादन होता है। आज के भारत का माध्य उत्पादन तो इसका पाँचवा भाग मात्र है। उल्लावूर का वार्षिक उत्पादन २.५ टन प्रतिव्यक्ति था। यह क्षेत्र के अत्युच्च माध्य से भी अढ़ायी गुना अधिक था। उल्लावूर, जैसा कि हमने पुस्तक में दिखाया है, कृषि में उत्कृष्ट था।

 

 

४.    भारत का गाँव केवल कृषि पर आधारित नहीं था।

 

उत्पादन में कृषि की प्रधानता थी। पर इस उत्पादन का उपयोग अनेकानेक कार्यों के लिये होता था। बार्नार्ड के सर्वेक्षण के अनुसार पूरे क्षेत्र के आधे के आसपास परिवार ही पूर्णतः कृषि से संबंधित हैं। अन्यों में बुनकर, बढ़ई, लोहार, स्वर्णकार, वणिक, शिक्षक, वैद्य, पुरोहित, संगीतकार, नृतक आदि परिवार थे।

 

उल्लावूर अवश्य कृषि-प्रधान था। कुण्ड्रत्तुर में तो कृषि गौण थी। वह प्रमुखतः संस्कृति एवं विद्वत्ता का केन्द्र था। वहाँ के ४७१ घरों में से ११६ घर बुनकरों के थे। 

 

उल्लावूर अपना सब कौशल कृषि में ही दिखाता था। उपलब्ध आंकड़ों के अनुसार हाँ के लोग तीन ऋतुओं में छह धान की फसलें उगाते थे। इनमें से कुछ फसलें अत्यन्त विशिष्ट एवं सुगन्धित धान की होती थीं। फिर भी यहाँ के ८३ घरों में से ३० प्रशासनिक, सांस्कृतिक, आर्थिक एवं अन्य अनेक प्रकार की सेवाएँ प्रदान करने वाले कृषि से इतर लोगों के थे।

 

 

५.    भारत का गाँव सुन्दर था। 

 

जो आंकड़े, प्रमाण एवं स्थान हमने देखे हैं उनसे स्पष्ट है कि भारत के गाँव और घर व्यवस्थित योजनाबद्ध सलीके से बनते थे। गाँव में एवं उसके आसपास स्थित अनेक मन्दिर, ताल-तालाब, पेड़ों के झुरमुट, फूलों के उद्यान आदि सब मिल कर अत्यन्त सुन्दर परिदृश्य की रचना करते थे।


उल्लावूर मात्र ८३ घरों की बस्ती थी। वहाँ २२ मन्दिर, १४ विभिन्न प्रकार के ताल, सिंचाई के लिए ४ बड़े जलाशय, ६ पेड़ों के झुरमुट, २ पुष्प-उद्यान थे। बहुत से मन्दिर एवं ताल और चारों जलाशय आज भी जीवित हैं। इनमें से अनेक बहुत विशाल एवं भव्य हैं।


कुण्ड्रत्तूर तो मन्दिरों की ही नगर है। दक्षिण में पहाड़ी पर स्थित मुरुगन हैं और पहाड़ी की ओर जाने वाले मार्ग पर तिरुकंदलीश्वरतिरुवालीश्वर और तिरुवूरगापेरुमाल् के मन्दिर एक पंक्ति में खड़े दिखते हैं। दूसरी ओर उत्तर मेंनगर के प्रवेश पर हीतिरुनागेश्वर का भव्य मन्दिर है। नगर में अनेक ताल हैं। इनमें से सबसे विशाल एवं सुन्दर नगर के केन्द्र में स्थित बालरावायार् कुलम् है। इसका नाम सेक्किऴार के बड़े भाई के नाम पर रखा गया है। स्वयं सेक्किऴार के अनेक स्मारक नगर में हैं।


कुण्ड्रत्तूर एवं उल्लावूर की विलक्षण भव्यता एवं सौंदर्य का कुछ आभास चित्रों में देने का प्रयास इन पुस्तकों में हुआ है। इस आलेख के साथ इन ग्रामों के कुछ चित्र भी हमने दिये हैं।

 

 

६.    भारत का गाँव स्वशासी था। 

 

अट्ठारहवीं शताब्दी के आंकड़ों के अनुसार उस समय के विपुल उत्पादन का प्रायः एक तिहाई भाग गाँव-समाज के विभिन्न सार्वजिनक कार्यों के संपादन के लिये नियोजित कर दिया जाता था। 

 

इस नियोजन के लिये भाग निकालने की परम्परा से चली आ रही एक विस्तृत पद्धति थी। इस पद्धति के दो भाग थे, एक को स्वतन्त्रम् कहते थे, दूसरे को मेरै। स्वतन्त्रम् भी दो स्तरों पर निकलता था। पहला स्वतन्त्रम् उपज की गहाई और तुलाई से पहले निकाल लिया जाता था। दूसरा स्वतन्त्रम् भी तुलाई से पहले निकलता था परन्तु गहाई के पश्चात्। तुली हुई उपज से दो प्रकार के मेरै निकलते थे। एक मेरै आधा सरकार वाले अंश और आधा कृषक् वाले अंश से निकलता था। एक अन्य मेरै उपज के केवल सरकार वाले अंश से निकलता था। ये चारों भाग मिल कर कुल उपज का प्रायः तीसरा भाग बनते थे।

 

जिन कार्यों के लिये उपज के प्रायः एक-तिहाई भाग का इस प्रकार नियोजन किया जाता था, उनकी सूचि बहुत लंबी है। इनमें गाँव की सुरक्षा करने वाले पालैयक्कारर् एवं तुक्किरिक्कारर् आदि, गाँव का लेखा रखने वाले कनक्कपिल्लै, सिंचायी व्यवस्थाओं की देखभाल करने वाले वेट्टि, उपज की तुलाई करने वाले अलवुक्कारन्, मन्दिरों के परिचारक, पुरोहित, नर्तक, देवदासियाँ एवं संगीतकार और पाठशालाओं के शिक्षक आदि आते थे। बढ़ई, लोहार, सुनार का भी भाग होता था, नाई और धोबी का भी और गाँव के वैद्य का भी। मन्दिरों, गाँव के संस्थापक गृहस्थों और कृषि में सहायक परैय्या गृहस्थों का भी अलग भाग होता था। गाँव के अपने संस्थानों एवं कार्यवाहकों के अतिरिक्त क्षेत्र के प्रमुख मन्दिरों, क्षेत्रीय स्तर के पालैयक्कारों, लेखपालों, विख्यात विद्वानों आदि के लिये भी गाँव की उपज से मेरै निकलता था। इस प्रकार राज्य से अपेक्षित समस्त कार्य गाँव स्वयं अपनी उपज में से विभिन्न कार्यों एवं संस्थानों के लिये निश्चित भाग निकाल कर कर लेता था। 

 

विभिन्न संस्थानों एवं सार्वजनिक कार्यों के लिये उपज के एक अंश के अतिरिक्त प्रायः इन सब हिताधिकारियों को कृषि-भूमि का कुछ भाग मान्यम के रूप में दिया जाता था, जिसका अर्थ था कि भूमि के इस भाग के राजस्व का अधिकार उन्हें प्राप्त होता था। पूरे क्षेत्र में कृषि-भूमि का प्रायः एक चौथायी भाग मान्यम था। कुण्ड्रत्तूर में यह भाग २० प्रतिशत के आसपास था। उल्लावूर की भूमि अत्यन्त उपजाऊ है। वहाँ कृषि-भूमि (सेयकाल्) का मात्र आठवाँ भाग मान्यम था। 

 

कृषि-भूमि का एक अंश का राजस्व मान्यम के रूप में पाकर गाँव के ये सब संस्थान एवं गृहस्थ सम्प्रभुता में भागीदार बन जाते थे। सम्प्रभु स्वशासी गाँव अपना शासन इन हिताधिकारियों के माध्यम से चलाता था। इस दृष्टि से गाँव ही राज्य था।

 

ऐसा स्वशासी गाँव भारतीय नीति की प्राथमिक इकाई था । गाँव अपने से बड़े क्षेत्र के संस्थानों एवं कार्यों का भी पोषण करता था। महात्मा गांधी ने स्वतन्त्रता के तुरन्त पूर्व स्वतन्त्र भारत के लिये समुद्रीय वृत्तों जैसी ऐसी ही व्यवस्था की कल्पना प्रस्तुत की थी। उस कल्पना में प्रत्येक वृत्त के केन्द्र में ग्राम था और वह वृत्त फैलता हुआ सम्पूर्ण राष्ट्र की रचना करता था। भारत के स्वशासी गाँव ऐसे  ही थे।

 

 

करणीय 

आजकल देश में अनौपनिवेशिकरण की बहुत चर्चा हो रही है। अंग्रेजों जो औपनिवेशिक व्यवस्था स्थापित कर गये हैं उससे उबरना तो तभी होगा जब हम अपने स्वशासी गाँवों को स्वशासन का अधिकार लौटा देंगे। वैसा करने में लगता है अभी हमें समय लगेगा। हम उस दिशा में बढ़ते रहें, उसके लिये आवश्यक है कि हम उन स्वशासी गाँवों का स्मृति को बनायें रखें। स्मृति को जीवित रखने के लिये हमें निम्न कार्य तो करते ही रहना चाहिये —

 

भारत के इन सुन्दरसमृद्ध स्वशासी एवं अनादि गाँवों का अध्ययन करते रहें।


अभिलेखों, शिलालेखोंताम्रलेखोंताड़पत्रोंसभ्यतागत साहित्य आदि का संकलन-संरक्षण-अध्ययन करते रहें।


कुछ विशिष्ट गाँवों का संरक्षण एवं जीर्णोद्धार करते रहें जिससे वे उस सनातन आदर्श के सजीव उदाहरण के रूप में हमारे समक्ष उपस्थित रहें।

 

इसी प्रक्रिया से समृद्ध सनातन भारत का प्रामाणिक इतिहास लिखा जायेगा। इसी प्रक्रिया से समृद्ध सनातन भारत औपनिवेशिक काल की अपनी निद्रा से पुनः जागृत हो पायेगा



इस आलेख का अंग्रेज़ी रूप ।


इन गाँवों से संबंधित कुछ चित्र।

 

पुस्तकों संबंधी आवश्यक सूचनाएँ



The Land, People and History of Ullavur, 
A locality that reaps the bounty of Palar 
by Jatinder K Bajaj and M. D, Srinivas 

 

Centre for Policy Studies, Chennai and 
Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, Delhi, 2024 
ISBN 978-81-19380-57-2  Price: 1566/-

 


The Land, People and History of Kundratthur 
The Abode of Murugan and the Birthplace of Sekkizhar 
by Jatinder K Bajaj and M. D, Srinivas 

 

Centre for Policy Studies, Chennai and 
Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, Delhi, 2024 
ISBN 978-81-19380-78-7  Price: 1652/-


The books are available at:
Ullavur: https://amzn.in/d/dY5Nta0 
Kundratthur: https://amzn.in/d/hy6ROqw

You may also please send your orders to [email protected] and copy it to [email protected]